Table 2. ANOVA and pairwise Tukey analysis to determine differences between sites and sample dates, based on PLFA and 16S analysis all dates and all sites (corresponds to Fig 3).
16S | PLFA | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | MDS1 | SD1 | MDS2 | SD2 | MDS1 | SD1 | MDS2 | SD2 |
AK 6/28/09 | -0.075 | 0.077cd | -0.052 | 0.056abc | -0.073 | 0.051bc | -0.148 | 0.057fg |
AK 8/8/09 | -0.019 | 0.042bc | -0.099 | 0.034c | -0.140 | 0.023c | -0.219 | 0.073g |
HI 7/2/09 | -0.137 | 0.019d | 0.021 | 0.062ab | -0.084 | 0.042bc | 0.095 | 0.049ab |
HI 8/13/09 | -0.155 | 0.034d | 0.029 | 0.055ab | -0.104 | 0.072bc | 0.072 | 0.053abcd |
HI 10/20/09 | -0.159 | 0.033d | 0.034 | 0.103ab | -0.074 | 0.053bc | 0.147 | 0.083a |
HI 2/11/10 | -0.148 | 0.034d | -0.053 | 0.059bc | -0.129 | 0.030c | 0.075 | 0.031abc |
FL 7/10/09 | 0.005 | 0.031bc | 0.045 | 0.042a | -0.082 | 0.1485bc | 0.022 | 0.102bcde |
FL 10/15/09 | 0.009 | 0.035b | 0.038 | 0.025ab | -0.017 | 0.0542b | 0.029 | 0.076bcde |
FL 2/15/10 | 0.013 | 0.082b | 0.041 | 0.083ab | 0.020 | 0.0046b | 0.075 | 0.039abcde |
UT 7/15/09 | 0.251 | 0.049a | 0.014 | 0.044ab | 0.252 | 0.017a | -0.047 | 0.057ef |
UT 10/3/09 | 0.231 | 0.041a | -0.032 | 0.036abc | 0.253 | 0.017a | -0.030 | 0.058cde |
UT 3/2/10 | 0.267 | 0.026a | 0.023 | 0.050ab | 0.254 | 0.020a | -0.035 | 0.026de |
P-value | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Superscript letter values indicate statistical differences between clusters of communities associated with MDS1 (x-axis) and MDS2 (y-axis). SD indicates standard deviation.