Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 24;156:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.012

Table 3.

Performance on working memory and episodic memory tasks at pre-training and post-training assessment.

Measure Control
Experimental
Pre-training Post-training Pre-training Post-training
Digit span length
 Forward span 6.14 (1.18) 6.36 (1.22) 6.04 (1.11) 6.25 (1.18)
 Backward spanb,c 4.04 (1.04) 4.07 (1.09) 3.82 (0.98) 4.68 (1.34)
Operation span
 Proportion correctb 0.67 (0.15) 0.72 (0.12) 0.70 (0.13) 0.72 (0.13)
N-back (2-back)
 Hit rate 0.62 (0.21) 0.63 (0.18) 0.68 (0.19) 0.68 (0.22)
 False alarm rate 0.21 (0.13) 0.19 (0.14) 0.17 (0.12) 0.16 (0.13)
d′ (sensitivity) 1.33 (0.93) 1.36 (0.73) 1.61 (0.92) 1.69 (1.04)
C (response bias) 0.26 (0.43) 0.33 (0.38) 0.23 (0.32) 0.27 (0.37)
Visuo-spatial working memoryc
 Proportion correct (3 items) 0.81 (0.14) 0.79 (0.16) 0.78 (0.22) 0.87 (0.12)
 Proportion correct (5 items) 0.25 (0.22) 0.34 (0.26) 0.30 (0.27) 0.48 (0.29)
 Proportion correct (7 items) 0.03 (0.07) 0.06 (0.10) 0.05 (0.12) 0.11 (0.17)
Free recall
 Mean # correct responsesa 4.46 (3.24) 5.21 (3.51) 6.93 (4.61) 6.96 (5.12)
Recognition memory
 Hit rate 0.75 (0.12) 0.75 (0.13) 0.76 (0.14) 0.79 (0.13)
 False alarm rateb 0.24 (0.14) 0.32 (0.21) 0.19 (0.14) 0.29 (0.19)
d′ (sensitivity)b 1.50 (0.47) 1.35 (0.70) 1.75 (0.53) 1.54 (0.66)
C (response bias)b 0.02 (0.35) −0.08 (0.47) 0.11 (0.44) −0.09 (0.45)
Metamemory
 Gamma 0.31 (0.29) 0.15 (0.39) 0.35 (0.25) 0.32 (0.34)

Note: Values represent Mean (Standard Deviation). Superscript letters indicate significant main effect of group (a), main effect of session (b), or group × session interaction (c). Free recall and recognition memory data were missing from one of 28 participants in the experimental group. Metamemory data were missing from three of 28 participants in the control group and six of 28 participants in the experimental group.