Table 2.
Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Model Selection
| No. of Trajectory Groups | Drinkers
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light (n=86)
|
Heavy (n=104)
|
|||||
| BIC | Null Modela | 2ln(B10)b | BIC | Null Modela | 2ln(B10)b | |
| 1 | −683 | −2729 | ||||
| 2 | −661 | 1 | 44 | −2663 | 1 | 132 |
| 3 | −669 | 2 | −17 | −2642 | 2 | 42 |
| 4 | −681 | 3 | −22 | −2632 | 3 | 20 |
| 5 | −697 | 4 | −33 | −2632 | 4 | 0 |
| 6 | −707 | 5 | −20 | −2646 | 5 | −28 |
The number of trajectory groups in the comparison model.
ln(B10) ≈ 2ΔBIC, ie, twice the difference in BIC between the 2 models, was used to determine the best model to describe quarterly frequency of binge drinking. Using 2ln(B10) ≥6 as a strong evidence for rejecting the null model,80 a 4-trajectory group model in heavy drinkers and a 2-trajectory group model in light drinkers best described the data (indicated in bold).