Table 3.
Method comparison
| Methods | n | r (95 % CI) |
|---|---|---|
| IMM | ||
| MAG | 240 | 0.0011 (−0.1269 to 0.1291) |
| KRY | 240 | −0.0235 (−0.1513 to 0.1050) |
| PHA | 240 | 0.0008 (−0.1266 to 0.1282) |
| LIA | 240 | 0.0707 (−0.0576 to 0.1966) |
| KRY | ||
| MAG | 240 | −0.0845 (−0.2108 to 0.0445) |
| LIA | 240 | −0.0988 (−0.2247 to 0.0304) |
| PHA | 240 | −0.0078 (−0.1362 to 0.1208) |
| LIA | ||
| MAG | 240 | 0.2628 (0.1390 to 0.3786) |
| PHA | 240 | 0.3679 (0.2521 to 0.4734) |
| MAG | ||
| PHA | 240 | 0.3226 (0.2028 to 0.4330) |
CI confidence intervals, IMM Immulite 2000 XPi, KRY Kryptor Compact Plus, LIA Liaison XL, MAG Maglumi 2000 Plus, PHA Phadia 250, r correlation coefficient