Table 2.
Patient no. | Difference anterior ROI | % Difference S2 vs. S1 anterior ROI | Difference posterior ROI | % Difference S2 vs. S1 anterior ROI | Difference right ROI | % Difference S2 vs. S1 anterior ROI | Difference left ROI | % Difference S2 vs. S1 anterior ROI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 69 | 77 | 57 | 78 | 162 | 49 | 132 | 54 |
2 | 100 | 58 | 71 | 58 | 164 | 39 | 167 | 36 |
3 | 41 | 97 | 60 | 96 | 75 | 95 | 21 | 98 |
4 | 45 | 84 | 12 | 94 | 110 | 63 | 121 | 59 |
5 | −10 | 104 | 98 | 63 | 45 | 83 | 13 | 95 |
6 | −6 | 103 | 122 | 53 | 136 | 57 | 143 | 56 |
7 | 62 | 95 | 86 | 94 | 30 | 98 | 78 | 94 |
8 | 63 | 95 | 27 | 98 | 26 | 98 | 37 | 97 |
9 | 55 | 96 | 117 | 91 | 45 | 96 | 12 | 99 |
10 | 38 | 88 | 131 | 60 | 44 | 83 | 82 | 73 |
11 | −13 | 103 | 156 | 71 | 103 | 77 | 18 | 96 |
12 | 162 | 88 | 155 | 89 | 208 | 85 | 177 | 87 |
13 | 60 | 80 | 313 | 20 | 123 | 57 | 115 | 57 |
14 | 43 | 70 | 97 | 30 | 151 | 20 | 174 | 20 |
15 | −122 | 142 | 51 | 85 | 122 | 68 | 13 | 96 |
16 | 25 | 90 | 61 | 71 | 169 | 45 | 91 | 64 |
17 | 45 | 79 | 82 | 56 | −2 | 102 | 22 | 85 |
18 | −29 | 112 | 104 | 60 | 191 | 51 | 155 | 53 |
19 | 27 | 88 | 34 | 86 | 129 | 52 | 55 | 80 |
20 | −8 | 103 | 103 | 65 | 87 | 71 | 141 | 56 |
21 | 130 | 37 | 177 | 25 | 89 | 31 | 123 | 27 |
22 | 200 | 51 | 200 | 50 | 121 | 61 | 128 | 65 |
23 | 26 | 83 | −4 | 103 | 157 | 38 | 84 | 59 |
24 | 186 | 49 | 106 | 38 | 89 | 62 | 121 | 53 |
25 | 115 | 73 | 147 | 60 | 188 | 51 | 144 | 61 |
Mean difference (p value) | 52 (p = 0.0011) | 102 (p < 0.0001) | 110 (p < 0.0001) | 95 (p < 0.0001) | ||||
Percent difference of S2 compared to S1 | 86 | 68 | 65 | 69 | ||||
Average global density of S2 compared to S1 | 71.9 |