Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;9:287. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00287

Table 4.

Non-egalitarian choice (option B) as a function of CRT (Study 2).

Decision 1 Decision 2 Decision 3 Decision 4 Decision 5 Decision 6
Dep var: β ≤ 0 β ≤ 0.5 α ≤ 0 α ≤ 0.125 β ≤ 0.25 α ≤ −0.25
(vs ≥ 0) (vs ≥ 0.5) (vs ≥ 0) (vs ≥ 0.125) (vs ≥ 0.25) (vs ≥ −0.25)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
CRT −0.149* 0.122* 0.124* 0.150** 0.109 −0.044
(0.088) (0.073) (0.069) (0.072) (0.067) (0.084)
[−0.031*] [0.040*] [0.047*] [0.049**] [0.042*] [−0.011]
Female 0.306 0.070 −0.285 −0.462** 0.294 −0.146
(0.276) (0.227) (0.213) (0.223) (0.216) (0.257)
[0.063] [0.023] [−0.108] [−0.151**] [0.113] [−0.035]
Cons −0.898*** 0.252 0.017 0.390 −0.250 −0.812***
(0.334) (0.271) (0.262) (0.264) (0.260) (0.315)
[0.184] [0.599] [0.507] [0.652] [0.401] [0.208]
ll −60.929 −90.969 −103.938 −90.902 −105.927 −68.750
Wald χ2 6.18** 2.89 6.86** 10.74*** 3.35 0.44
Pseudo R2 0.045 0.017 0.035 0.063 0.016 0.004
N 158 158 158 158 158 158

Probit estimates. The α and β parameters associated with the dependent variable are displayed on top of each column. Robust standard errors clustered on individuals are shown in parentheses and average marginal effects of the explanatory variables are shown in square brackets (for the constant, this value represents the probability obtained from normal transformation of the Probit coefficient).

*, **, ***

denote p-values lower than 0.10, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.