Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;9:142. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00142

Table 1.

Best Rand and information theoretic scores of all teams and the human experts using the undisclosed test set at ISBI.

Method VRand VInfo
Human 1 vs. consensus 0.997 ± 0.001 0.997 ± 0.001
human 2 vs. consensus 0.971 ± 0.003 0.941 ± 0.002
IDSIA 0.944 ± 0.011 0.968 ± 0.002
BlackEagles 0.929 ± 0.008 0.916 ± 0.003
MLL-ETH 0.927 ± 0.008 0.923 ± 0.004
SCI 0.915 ± 0.016 0.967 ± 0.003
CellProfiler 0.904 ± 0.015 0.937 ± 0.006
Harvard 0.892 ± 0.017 0.947 ± 0.004
CoMPLEX 0.877 ± 0.019 0.903 ± 0.008
UCL 0.860 ± 0.020 0.939 ± 0.005
TSC+PP 0.843 ± 0.012 0.838 ± 0.006
IMMI 0.826 ± 0.022 0.862 ± 0.008
CLP 0.809 ± 0.018 0.846 ± 0.005
Freiburg 0.800 ± 0.026 0.825 ± 0.005
NIST 0.730 ± 0.021 0.757 ± 0.007

Mean and standard error are computed over 20 test images not used for the public leaderboard.