Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 7;7(6):1316–1327. doi: 10.1111/irv.12103

Table 4.

Perception of risk posed by H1N1 (n/N,% respondents)

Study Low riska Medium risk High riska
Personal risk of contracting H1N1
Bults12
N = 1868a
5% in April 2009 (n = 456)
5% in June 2009 (n = 478)
15% in Aug 2009 (n = 934)
Eastwood10
N = 830
211/830, 25·4%
Gilles21
N = 1551
Mean 2·29 [0·75] (likert 1–5 scale)
Ibuka6
N = 1290
Approximately 37% on perceived likelihood scale (0–100%)
Lau11
N = 301
237/301, 77·7% 67/301, 22·3%
Lau13
N = 999
8·6%–11·7%
Quinn17
N = 1543
1273/1543, 85·8%
Seale9
N = 620
235/620, 37·9% 201/620, 32·4% 133/620, 21·4%
Seale20
N = 627
332/627, 52·9% 175/627, 27·9% 109/627, 17·4%
Community risk from H1N1
Lau11
N = 301
Family 30/301 (10%)
General public 35/301 (12%)
Lau13
N = 999
Family 8·7%
General public 12·5%
Quinn17
 n = 1543
1148/1543, 75·3%
Seale20
N = 627
272/627, 43·4% 247/627, 39·4% 99/627, 15·8%
a

Low risk: very unlikely/unlikely to be at risk, high risk: likely/very likely to be at risk.

Percentages are those extracted exactly from included studies.