Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 22;15(10):26877–26905. doi: 10.3390/s151026877

Table 5.

Comparisons between ELM and SVM/LS-SVM in terms of VOR (%) and Fps. CSR, constrained sparse representation.

Sequence ELM + CSR SVM + CSR LS-SVM + CSR
Car4 0.89 0.78 0.76
Car11 0.85 0.76 0.74
Singer1 0.83 0.65 0.69
Caviar1 0.82 0.81 0.85
Caviar2 0.85 0.75 0.73
Occlusion1 0.85 0.56 0.51
Occlusion2 0.82 0.57 0.53
Mhyang 0.79 0.71 0.73
Girl 0.71 0.54 0.42
DavidIndoor 0.61 0.56 0.59
Dudek 0.69 0.63 0.61
Dog1 0.83 0.74 0.76
CarScale 0.79 0.75 0.71
boy 0.84 0.76 0.73
Average 0.80 0.68 0.67
Fps 7 1 6