Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 2;3(2):69–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00072.x

Table 1.

In vitro resistance to amantadine


 
Sample 
 
Date 
 
Country 
Type/
Subtype Substitution 
conferring 
resistance 
Predicted 
sensitivity Predicted 
IC50(μg 
amantadine/ml)
FLU5148 23‐November‐2006 Ecuador A/H1N1 Leu26Phe R >1000
FLU4129 01‐August‐2006 Peru A/H1N1 S 0·25
FLU5376 31‐January‐2007 Peru A/ H1N1 S 0·3
FLU4499 13‐October‐2006 Nicaragua A/H1N1 S 0·3
FLU3443 18‐April‐2006 Peru A/H3N2 Ser31Asn R >1000
FLU3601 31‐March‐2006 Peru A/H3N2 Ser31Asn R >1000
FLU6219 20‐March‐2007 Venezuela A/H3/N2 Ser31Asn R >1000
FLU6849 09‐May‐2007 Ecuador A/H3N2 Ser31Asn R 1000
lQE5463 14‐May‐2007 Peru A/H3N2 Ser31Asn R >1000
FLU5674 06‐March‐2007 Peru A/H3N2 S 0·25
FLU5854 08‐March‐2007 Peru A/H3N2 S 0·5
FSC0799 30‐July‐2005 Peru A/H3N2 S 0·2
FLU6151 17‐April‐2007 Peru B R >1000

The table shows the concentration of amantadine giving 50% of plaque assay inhibition (IC50) for different viruses types and subtypes. The table shows the date and country where the samples were collected, the type and subtype determined based on sequence analysis of RT‐PCR amplicons of the corresponding hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes, the substitution conferring resistance to amantadine, the inferred sensibility to amantadine and finally their sensibility to amantadine found in vitro.