Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;14:102. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0095-4

Table 2.

Statistical dependence of physiological measures on changes in chest compression waveform or depth

Measurement Model 1:  WF analysis Model 2: Depth analysis Model 3: WF + Depth analysis
WF Depth WF Depth
AOP WF 2 > WF 1, WF 3 ns WF 2 > WF 1, W F3 ns
RAP WF2 > WF 1 1.25″ > 1.9″ ns 1.25″ > 1.9″
CPP WF 2 > WF 3; WF 2 > WF 1 1.9″ > 1.25 WF 2 > WF1, WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″
EtCO2 WF 1 > WF 2 1.9″ > 1.25″ ns 1.9″ > 1.25″
AOR flow WF 3 < WF 1,WF 2 ns WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 ns
IVC flow ns 1.9″ > 1.25″ ns 1.9″ > 1.25″
CAR flow WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 1.9″ > 1.25″
JUG flow WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 ns WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 ns
RENA flow WF 1 > WF 3 ns WF 1 > WF 3 ns
RENV flow WF 1 > WF 3; WF1 > WF 2 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 1 > WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″

Italics text represents statistical significant (p < 0.05), normal text represents a statistical trend (p < 0.1), and non-significant differences are represented by ns