Table 2.
Measurement | Model 1: WF analysis | Model 2: Depth analysis | Model 3: WF + Depth analysis | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WF | Depth | WF | Depth | |
AOP | WF 2 > WF 1, WF 3 | ns | WF 2 > WF 1, W F3 | ns |
RAP | WF2 > WF 1 | 1.25″ > 1.9″ | ns | 1.25″ > 1.9″ |
CPP | WF 2 > WF 3; WF 2 > WF 1 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ | WF 2 > WF1, WF 3 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ |
EtCO2 | WF 1 > WF 2 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ | ns | 1.9″ > 1.25″ |
AOR flow | WF 3 < WF 1,WF 2 | ns | WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 | ns |
IVC flow | ns | 1.9″ > 1.25″ | ns | 1.9″ > 1.25″ |
CAR flow | WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ | WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ |
JUG flow | WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 | ns | WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 | ns |
RENA flow | WF 1 > WF 3 | ns | WF 1 > WF 3 | ns |
RENV flow | WF 1 > WF 3; WF1 > WF 2 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ | WF 1 > WF 3 | 1.9″ > 1.25″ |
Italics text represents statistical significant (p < 0.05), normal text represents a statistical trend (p < 0.1), and non-significant differences are represented by ns