Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;14:102. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0095-4

Table 3.

Statistical dependence results from multivariate analysis that include possible interactions between chest compression release time and chest compression depth

Measurement Model 4: WF + Depth + WF*Depth analysis
WF Depth WF*depth
AOP WF 2 > WF 1, WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 2 > WF 1, WF 3 at 1.9″
RAP WF 2 > WF 1 1.25″ > 1.9″ WF 1 < WF 2, WF 3 at 1.9″
CPP WF 2 > WF 1, WF 3; WF 1 > WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″ ns
EtCO2 WF 1 > WF 2, WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 1 > WF 2, WF 3 at 1.9″
AOR flow ns ns WF 3 < WF 2 at 1.25″
IVC flow WF 3 < WF 1 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 1 > WF 2, WF 3 at 1.9″; WF 2 > WF 1 at 1.25″
CAR flow WF 3 < WF1, WF 2 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 3 < WF 1,WF 2 at 1.9″; WF 3 < WF 1 at 1.25″
JUG flow WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 ns WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 at 1.9″
RENA flow WF 1 > WF 3 ns WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 at 1.9″
RENV flow WF 1 > WF 2, WF 3 1.9″ > 1.25″ WF 1 > WF 2 at 1.9″; WF 3 < WF 1, WF 2 at 1.25″

Italics text represents statistical significant (p < 0.05), normal text represents a statistical trend (p < 0.1), and non-significant differences are represented by ns