Table 7.
Performances of the proposed ensemble methods and state-of-the-art methods
| Dataset | Method | AUPR | Hamming loss | Ranking loss | One error | Coverage | Average precision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pauwels’s dataset | Pauwels’s method | 0.3883 | 0.0577 | 0.0827 | 0.1779 | 832.7827 | 0.4616 |
| ensemble method | 0.4286 | 0.0454 | 0.0737 | 0.1689 | 790.6261 | 0.4925 | |
| Mizutani’s dataset | Mizutani’s method | 0.4107 | 0.0557 | 0.0888 | 0.1854 | 862.9757 | 0.4795 |
| ensemble method | 0.4504 | 0.0500 | 0.0761 | 0.1657 | 809.6672 | 0.5012 | |
| Liu’s dataset | Liu's method | 0.2514 | 0.0721 | 0.0927 | 0.9291 | 837.4579 | 0.2610 |
| ensemble method | 0.4802 | 0.0524 | 0.0703 | 0.1202 | 795.9435 | 0.5134 |