Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141210

Table 2. Channel widening, downstream, upstream, and total footprint for each dam.

Downstream footprints were determined by measuring the distribution of median substrate size (D50) from riffles downstream of dam (see Figs 6 and 8). Extent of channel widening, and upstream footprints were determined using aerial photography. Footprints are expressed in terms of multiples of mean wetted width, with kilometers in parentheses. The mean wetted width used in calculations was 0.022 km for the Neosho River and 0.035 km for the Cottonwood River.

River Site Channel widening (No. widths (km)) Upstream footprint (No. widths (km)) Downstream footprint (No. widths (km)) Total footprint (No. widths (km))
Upper Neosho Riverwalk 2 (0.05) 100 (2.2) 59 (1.3) 160 (3.5)
Correll 11 (0.25) 300 (6.6) 55 (1.2) 355 (7.8)
Ruggles 10 (0.21) 295 (6.5) 55 (1.2) 350 (7.7)
Emporia 9 (0.2) 127 (2.8) 9 (0.2) 136 (3)
Lower Cottonwood Cottonwood Falls 6 (0.22) 391 (13.7) 46 (1.6) 437 (15.3)
Soden 6 (0.21) 245 (8.6) 40 (1.4) 286 (10)
Overall Mean 7 (0.19) 243 (6.7) 44 (1.2) 287 (7.9)
Total 44 (1.14) 1458 (40.4) 264 (6.9) 1,724 (47.3)
Range 2, 11 (0.05, 0.25) 100, 391 (2.2, 13.7) 9, 59 (0.2, 1.6) 136, 437 (3.0, 15.3)

* footprint is estimated based on available data