Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0142309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142309

Table 3. Intra Class Correlation coefficients for all non-diabetes controls (n = 20).

Observer reliability measure The manual protocol ICC and 95%CI* The semi-automated protocol ICC and 95%CI Comparison of semi-auto to manual P-Value The fully automated protocol ICC and 95%CI Comparison of fully auto to manual P-Value Comparison of fully auto to semi-auto P-Value
CNFL Inter 0.68(0.35,0.86) 0.73(0.43,0.88) 0.34 0.75(0.25,0.91) 0.38 0.50
Intra 0.72(0.39,0.88) 0.77 (0.50,0.90) 0.32 0.81(0.59,0.92) 0.16 0.31
CNFD Inter 0.39(-0.04,0.70) 0.72(0.42,0.88) 0.018 0.52(0.09,0.78) 0.27 0.92
Intra 0.51(0.10,0.78) 0.69(0.36,0.87) 0.11 0.72(0.39,0.88) 0.084 0.41
CNBD Inter 0.35(-0.11,0.71) 0.44(0.04,0.73) 0.31 0.50(0.08,0.77) 0.23 0.39
Intra 0.58(0.21,0.81) 0.58(0.08,0.75) 0.74 0.49(0.09,0.76) 0.70 0.47

ICC: Intra-class correlation coefficient (2, 1). Inter refers to inter-observer reproducibility, intra to intra-observer reproducibility. The manual protocol included manual image selection and manual image analysis. The semi-automated protocol included manual image selection and automated analysis. The fully-automated protocol included automated image selection and automated analysis. CNFL, corneal nerve fibre length. CNFD, corneal nerve fibre density. CNBD, corneal nerve branch density.

* Manual protocol ICC have been presented in a previous publication and are shown here for comparison.