Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;35(44):14885–14895. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2957-15.2015

Table 1.

Summary of clusters showing significantly higher decoding accuracy of priming effects at each level of abstraction compared with the two other levels

Location Peak MNI Peak decoding accuracy Cluster size (no. of searchlights)
Selective congruency level decoding
    R. putamen (18, 8, −5) 0.78 10
    L. calcarine and precuneus (−21, −58, 4) 0.78 56
    L. insula (−39, −1, −2) 0.76 11
    R. medial frontal gyrus (12, 50, 16) 0.78 56
    R. caudate (15, 5, 16) 0.82 35
    L. caudate (−18, −10, 22) 0.78 14
    Precuneus (−12, −67, 34) 0.88 48
    Middle cingulate (6, −10, 49) 0.80 21
Selective category level decoding
    L. medial frontal gyrus (−15, 47, 4) 0.82 13
    R. inferior frontal gyrus (45, 11, 19) 0.86 9
    L. precental gyrus and L. postcental gyrus (−45, −7, 37) 0.82 36
Selective identity level decoding
    L. fusiform gyrus and L. parahippocampal gyrus (−24, −37, −14) 0.92 46
    L. inferior frontal gyrus (−18, 17, −20) 0.80 19
    L. superior and middle temporal gyri (−54, −7, −11) 0.80 37
    R. superior and middle temporal gyri (57, −40, −13) 0.84 84
    R. middle occipital gyrus (36, −85, 10) 0.84 11
    L. middle occipital gyrus (−39, −67, 13) 0.88 21
    L. Superior occipital gyrus and precuneus (−24, −73, 28) 0.80 9
    R. Superior occipital gyrus and precuneus (18, −73, 31) 0.84 14
    Precuneus (−9, −43, 43) 0.76 14

Peak decoding accuracy refers to the level that shows superior decoding accuracy than the other two levels.