Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078–2086. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427

Table 3.

Mean (SD) effective dose for each type of CT study at each of the four sites

Anatomic Area Type of CT Study Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 P value

Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)




Head and Neck Routine Head 2.8 (1.0) 1.8 (0.3) 2.8 (1.2) 1.9 (0.4) p<.00001
Routine Neck 2.8 (1.0) 5.9 (1.5) 5.1 (1.4) 2.3 (0.6) p<.00001
Suspected Stroke 18 (13) 15 (3.3) 7.6 (2.0) 29 (8.0) p<.00001

Chest Routine Chest, no contras 5.2 (2.6) 12 (6.6) 11 (3.9) 7.4 (3.4) p<.00001
Routine Chest, with contrast 6.6 (5.4) 11 (4.8) 11 (4.0) 7.9 (3.8) p<.00001
Suspected Pulmonary Embolism 8.1 (3.4) 21 (6.8) 9.0 (2.0) 9.0 (3.3) p<.00001
Coronary Angiogram 21.4 (8.9) 19.7 (6.2) p=.75

Abdomen and Pelvis Routine Abdomen-Pelvis, no contrast 12 (7.0) 19 (7.4) 20 (7.2) 12 (5.2) p<.00001
Routine Abdomen-Pelvis, with contrast 12 (6.1) 16 (6.7) 20 (7.4) 15 (6.2) p=.00027
Multiphase Abdomen-Pelvis 24 (13) 35 (8.0) 45 (14) 34 (17) p= .00001
Suspected Aneurysm or Dissection 49 (14) 25 (18) 22 (8.0) 25 (10) p<.00001