Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 2;45(5):184–189. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.184

Table 3. Comparison of the changes in clinical attachment level between treatment and three to six months of follow-up.

Defect Site n Baseline to three months Three months to six months Baseline to six months
Mean±SD P-value Mean±SD P-value Mean±SD P-value
Horizontal Interdental CAL 68 0.70±0.36 <0.001 0.05±0.24 0.244 0.75±0.38 <0.001
Total CAL 204 1.02±0.61 <0.001 0.16±0.53 0.086 1.18±0.68 <0.001
Vertical Interdental CAL 68 0.39±0.38 <0.001 0.06±0.31 0.239 0.46±0.39 <0.001
Total CAL 204 0.72±0.51 <0.001 0.02±0.47 0.856 0.74±0.46 <0.001
Horizontal Interdental CALD 68 1.02±0.92 <0.039 0.16±0.61 0.172 1.18±1.01 <0.005
Total CALD 204 0.70±0.81 <0.001 0.05±0.55 0.791 0.75±0.88 <0.001
Vertical Interdental CALD 68 0.72±0.71 <0.039 0.02±0.64 0.172 0.74±0.77 <0.005
Total CALD 204 0.39±0.78 <0.001 0.06±0.57 0.791 0.46±0.81 <0.001

SD, standard deviation; CAL, clinical attachment level; CALD, difference in clinical attachment level changes.