Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2015 Nov;27(4 0 2):1471–1487. doi: 10.1017/S0954579415000887

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Change in RSA as a function of experimental condition, child maltreatment, neighborhood crime, and GABRA6 genotype: (3a.) Condition x Maltreatment Status within the Low Neighborhood Crime and GABRA6 CC genotype group; (3b.) Condition x Maltreatment Status within the High Neighborhood Crime and GABRA6 CC genotype group.

Note: Group contrasts.

Non-Maltreated: Challenge < Baseline 1 *
Neglected: ns
Neglected Plus: ns

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001

Note: Group contrasts.

Non-Maltreated: Challenge < Baseline 1 *
Baseline 2 > Challenge ***
Baseline 2 > Baseline 1 *
Neglected: ns
Neglected Plus: ns

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001

Change in RSA as a function of experimental condition, child maltreatment, neighborhood crime, and GABRA6 genotype: (3c.) Condition x Maltreatment Status within the Low Neighborhood Crime and GABRA6 CT or TT genotype group; (3d.) Condition x Maltreatment Status within the High Neighborhood Crime and GABRA6 CT or TT genotype group.

Note: Group contrasts.

Non-Maltreated: Challenge < Baseline 1 ***
Baseline 2 > Challenge ***
Neglected: ns
Neglected Plus: Challenge < Baseline 1 ***
Baseline 2 > Challenge **

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001

Note: Group contrasts.

Non-Maltreated: Challenge < Baseline 1 *
Baseline 2 > Challenge *
Neglected: ns
Neglected Plus: Baseline 2 > Challenge *
Baseline 2 > Baseline 1 **

* p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001