Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;14:438. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0975-x

Table 2.

Comparison of participants′ characteristics by malaria parasitaemia low vs. high

Parasitaemia
Low High Total p*
Number of participants, N (%) 1292 (62) 777 (38) 2069 (100)
Gravidity, N (%)a
 Primi/secundigravida 819 (65.8) 486 (65.9) 1305 (65.5) 0.67
 Multigravida 425 (34.2) 263 (35.1) 688 (34.5)
Residence, N (%)b
 Urban 326 (25.3) 189 (24.1) 513 (24.9) 0.54
 Rural 960 (74.7) 588 (75.9) 1548 (75.1)
Distance to healthcare facility, N (%)c
 0–5 (km) 464 (36.1) 255 (33.0) 719 (34.9) 0.17
 5–10 (km) 487 (37.9) 290 (37.5) 777 (37.8)
 10+ (km) 334 (26.0) 228 (29.5) 576 (27.3)
Antenatal care, N (%)d
 Yes 1014 (78.5) 627 (80.7) 1641 (79.3) 0.23
 No 278 (21.5) 150 (19.3) 428 (20.7)
Household size, mean (SD)e 4.51 (2.0) 4.36 (1.9) 4.40 (1.9) 0.07
Age (Years), mean (SD)f 29.10 (5.8) 28.90 (5.8) 29.00 (5.7) 0.44

* Significance based on Chi square and ANOVA p value <0.05

aMissing 48 low parasitaemia, 28 high parasitaemia

bMissing 6 low parasitaemia

cMissing 7 low parasitaemia, 4 high parasitaemia

dNo missing data

eMissing 10 low parasitaemia, 9 high parasitaemia

fNo missing data