Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 7;70(5):709–717. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt134

Table 2.

Model Fitting Results

Model Flexibility Fine motor Balance
−2LL (df) −2LL (df) −2LL (df)
Initial model testing
 1. Full model 5,248 (3,057) 6,870 (3,018) 6,172 (2,951)
 2. Equate all across sex 5,294 (3,085)* 6,882 (3,046) 6,202 (2,979)
 3. Equate LGCM across sex 5,265 (3,061)** 6,873 (3,022) 6,177 (2,955)
 4. Equate biometric across sex 5,280 (3,081) 6,879 (3,042) 6,199 (2,975)
Follow-up testing of LGCM
 5. Equate I across sex 5,253 (3,058)* 6,870 (3,019) 6,174 (2,952)
 6. Equate P across sex 5,258 (3,058)** 6,871 (3,019) 6,173 (2,952)
 7. Equate S1 across sex 5,253 (3,058)* 6,872 (3,019) 6,174 (2,952)
 8. Equate S2 across sex 5,252 (3,058)* 6,871 (3,019) 6,178 (2,952)
Follow-up testing of biometric
 9. Equate all A across sex 5,249 (3,063) 6,873 (3,024) 6,220 (2,957)**
 10. Drop all A for women 5,248 (3,063) 6,870 (3,024) 6,185 (2,957)*
 11. Drop all A for men 5,248 (3,063) 6,872 (3,024) 6,172 (2,957)

Notes. LGCM = latent growth curve model.

*Difference in model fit vs Model 1 is significant at p < .05.

**Difference in model fit vs Model 1 is significant at p < .01.