Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 5;36(11):1284–1290. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgv121

Table 4.

Joint effects of average telomere length and telomere length variation on bladder cancer risk, using the median of all subjects as cutoffs

Avg_TL/TLV N OR (95% CI) P-for-trend
Case Control
All subject
 Short/low 16 80 Ref
 Short/high 66 77 3.55 (1.79–7.04)
 Long/low 70 73 4.77 (2.37–9.59)
 Long/high 72 23 14.68 (6.74–31.98) <0.001
Age ≤ 60
 Short/low 4 43 Ref
 Short/high 24 31 5.99 (1.83–19.60)
 Long/low 39 38 8.38 (2.68–26.19)
 Long/high 39 9 41.08 (10.68–158.07) <0.001
Age > 60
 Short/low 31 35 ref
 Short/high 33 14 2.74 (1.14–6.58)
 Long/low 12 37 3.12 (1.23–7.87)
 Long/high 42 46 7.52 (2.74–20.64) <0.001

The penalized likelihood approach was used in the estimates when data are sparse (cell count <5). The median values of all subjects were used as cutoffs when creating groups. ORs were adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status and education.

Avg_TL, average telomere length; TLV, telomere length variation.