Table 4.
Results of logistic regression analysis to predict the association between TOP and different forms of IPV
| Experience of IPV | Ever had TOP | TOP in last 5 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted OR (95 % CI) | Crude OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted OR (95 % CI) | |
| Physical and/or sexual IPV | 1.35*** (1.09–1.81) | 1.29** (1.01–1.65) | 1.73** (1.29–3.41) | 1.61 (0.99–2.60) |
| Physical IPV | 1.44*** (1.16–2.01) | 1.36*** (1.05–1.77) | 1.80*** (1.23–3.21) | 1.72** (1.11–2.06) |
| Sexual IPV | 1.01 (0.73–1.40) | 1.03 (0.74–1.44) | 0.73 (0.36–1.48) | 0.83 (0.41–1.71) |
| Minor physical IPV | 1.49*** (1.19–1.87) | 1.47** (1.16–1.87) | 1.40** (1.08–2.17) | 1.84** (1.16–2.93) |
| Severe physical IPV | 1.50** (1.13–1.98) | 1.45*** (1.08–1.94) | 1.66* (1.04–2.76) | 2.20 (1.28–3.77) |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval. Models were adjusted for age, age at first marriage, education, place of residence, wealth index, religion, wanted last child, children ever born and ever used modern contraceptive method