Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;14:59. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0055-6

Table 2.

Opinion about euthanasia in general

Opinion Multiple regressionb
Unfavourable (1) Favourable (2) p a OR IC (95 %) p
n (%) n (%) (1) versus (2)
Gender Female (n = 239) 140 (58.6) 99 (41.4) 0.146 1 [0.74–2.25] 0.353
Male (n = 174) 92 (52.9) 82 (47.1) 1.29
Age >27 years (n = 198) 172 (86.9) 26 (13.1) <0.001 1 [0.42–2.55] 0.924
≤27 years (n = 215) 60 (27.9) 155 (72.1) 1.04
Marital status Couple (n = 281) 179 (63.7) 102 (36.3) <0.001 1 [0.47–1.48] 0.539
Single (n = 132) 53 (40.2) 79 (59.8) 0.83
Child Yes (n = 163) 151 (92.6) 12 (7.4) <0.001 1 [0.47–4.73] 0.493
No (n = 250) 81 (32.4) 169 (67.6) 1.49
Believes in God No (n = 203) 119 (58.6) 84 (41.4) 0.188 1 [1.08–3.26] 0.024
Yes (n = 210) 113 (53.8) 97 (46.2) 1.88
Has taken care of someone nearing the end of life Yes (n = 203) 133 (66.0) 68 (34.0) <0.001 1 [0.72–2.15] 0.429
No (n = 210) 98 (46.7) 112 (53.3) 1.24
Professional status Pall care specialists (n = 170) 164 (96.5) 6 (3.5) <0.001 1 [13.18–248.22] <0.001
Medical interns (n = 243) 68 (28.0) 175 (72.0) 57.20
Specialisation Others (n = 130)c 84 (64.6) 46 (35.4) 0.012 1 [0.43–1.54] 0.548
General practice (n = 283) 148 (52.3) 135 (47.7) 0.82

a p-Value for Pearson’s χ2

bHosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.316

cOthers: oncology, surgery, anaesthesia, psychiatry, pneumology, public health, gynaecology