Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010 Sep;37(5):427–432. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0258-3

Table 1.

Competitive employment rates for three supported employment programs: calculations based on varying timeframes and sample criteria

Program 24-Month participation window
Calendar quartera
Work interested participants onlyb
All participantsc
Participants active in services
n/N % N/N % n/N %
IPS + ACTd 42/66 64 e e 15/53 28
South Carolina
Vocational PACTf 41/64 64 49/86 57 20/67 30
Massachusetts
Certified clubhouseg 34/58 59 43/89 48 18/69 26
Massachusetts
a

1st quarter 1998; all participants with at least three service contacts and one total hour of service

b

Work interested = participants stating an interest in work at time of study enrollment

c

All participants = all randomized participants regardless of work interest at time of enrollment

d

Individual Placement and Support (IPS) program of supported employment integrated with an assertive community treatment program. South Carolina Project: Employment Intervention Demonstration Program

e

– = IPS program exclusion criterion of individuals expressing no work interest

f

Vocationally-integrated Program of Assertive Community Treatment. Massachusetts project: Employment Intervention Demonstration Program

g

Clubhouse program certified by the International Center for Clubhouse Development. Massachusetts project: Employment Intervention Demonstration Program