Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2015 Apr;16(3):463–474. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0512-0

Table 2.

Effect of Intervention Delivery Format on Outcomes, Net of Other Intervention and Participant Characteristics

Characteristics Model 1a
Model 2 (k = 15)
Model 3 (k = 17)
Model 4 (k = 16)
Model 5 (k = 17)
Model 6 (k = 17)
b 95% CI b 95% CI b 95% CI b 95% CI b 95% CI b 95% CI
Format (Group = 1) −0.49 [−1.00, 0.01] −0.49 [−1.08, 0.10] −0.44 [−0.95, 0.07] −0.71* [−1.32, −0.09] −0.56 [−1.19, 0.07] −0.57 [−1.85, 0.71]
Average age (years) 0.05 [−0.19, 0.30] 0.06 [−0.17, 0.28]
Hazardous use (y = 1) 0.36 [−0.18, 0.90] 0.28 [−0.23, 0.79]
Duration (minutes) −0.00 [−0.01, 0.00] 0.00 [−0.00, 0.01]
Personal feedback (y = 1) 0.22 [−0.36, 0.79] −0.12 [−0.75, 0.51]
MET modality (y = 1) 0.44 [−0.09, 0.97] −0.08 [−1.38, 1.21]
Constant −0.33 [−3.83, 3.18] 0.41 [−0.03, 0.84] 0.48* [−0.00, 0.97] 0.65* [0.08, 1.23] 0.65 [−0.69, 2.0]

τ2 0.18 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.16
I2res (%) 72.17 63.66 64.78 65.92 69.46
Adjusted R2 7.61 25.88 28.41 11.83 11.89

Note. k = number of studies. b = unstandardized coefficient from meta-regression model. CI = confidence interval. MET = motivational enhancement therapy.

a

Model 1 shows coefficients from six separate bivariate meta-regression models.

p < .10.

*

p < .05.