Table 3. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis considering four DCV/ASV prices.
Total treatment cost ($US) | Total cost DCV/ASV ($US) | Total QALY DCV/ASV | Total cost PR ($US) | Total QALY PR | ICER a ($US/QALY) | Prob. of cost-effectiveness b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local utility estimates | 77,419 | 80,117 | 16,635 | 43,6% | |||
58,065 | 60,775 | 14.6 | 17,803 | 10.9 | 11,581 | 71,5% | |
38,710 | 41,856 | 6,375 | 91,6% | ||||
19,355 | 22,920 | 1,364 | 98,6% | ||||
Literature utility estimates | 38,710 | 41,958 | 12.6 | 17,921 | 10.08 | 9,241 | 86.3% |
PR: Peginterferon plus Ribavirin, PIs: Protease Inhibitors, DCV/ASV: Daclatasvir plus Asunaprevir, QALY: Quality Adjusted Life Years, ICER: Incremental cost effectiveness ratio, 1 $US = 620 CLP
aMontecarlo simulation (5,000 iterations)
bConsidering a suggested threshold of 1times GDP per capita