Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr;43(2):155–171. doi: 10.1007/s11414-014-9392-0

Table 4.

Unadjusted global quality of life scoresa by Clubhouse and PACT programs, and competitive work group, over the 24-month participation period

Time Clubhouse (N=83)
PACT (N=84)
Competitive work
No competitive work
Competitive work
No competitive work
nb M (SD) n M (SD) n M (SD) n M (SD)
Baselinec 41 6.58 (3.07) 42 7.00 (3.15) 47 7.47 (3.22) 37 7.30 (3.33)
6 months 33 7.73 (3.04) 27 7.33 (3.05) 38 7.74 (3.03) 30 7.93 (3.02)
12 months 31 8.61 (3.21) 29 7.86 (3.20) 41 8.10 (2.90) 30 8.20 (2.28)
18 months 33 8.67 (3.03) 28 7.46 (3.12) 43 8.00 (2.57) 31 8.10 (3.10)
24 months 34 8.26 (3.23) 30 7.67 (3.06) 38 7.79 (2.98) 28 8.11 (2.96)

Clubhouse program certified by International Center for Clubhouse Development, PACT Program of Assertive Community Treatment

a

Lehman’s Quality of Life Interview (sum of first and last items);29 possible scores range from 7 to 14, with higher scores indicating more satisfaction with life in general.

b

n=respondents at each time point of measurement

c

Test of baseline difference across groups: F(3,163)=0.35, p=0.56, η2=0.00