Table 3.
Mean, median and third quartile DAP values for CAG and PCI
| Study | No. of patients | DAP or KAP (Gy cm2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Median | Third quartile | Range or upper limit | |||
| CAG | Present study 2012 | 361 | 67.6 | 54.7 | 75.6 | 13.8 to 853.9 |
| Sapinn et al. 2004 [19] | 176 | 48.6 | 37 | 59.6 | 6.3 to 452.8 | |
| Van de Putte et al. 2000 [20] | 62 | 60.64 | 56.82 | 80.58 | 144.23 | |
| Betsou et al. 1999 [21] | 29 | 30.4 | ||||
| D’Helft et al. 2009 [22] | 967 | 37.86 | 30.64 | 41.71 | 1.36 to 231.01 | |
| PCI | Present study 2014 | 514 | 187 | 143 | 213 | 96 to 5220 |
| Sapinn et al. 2004 [19] | 70 | 153 | 103 | 189.5 | 18.8 to 655.0 | |
| Van de Putte et al. 2000 [20] | 10 | 165.95 | 131.61 | 185.83 | 2.0 to 345.72 | |
| Betsou et al. 1999 [21] | 7 | 70.7 | ||||
| D’Helft et al. 2009 [22] | 463 | 78.3 | 58.05 | 83.56 | 47.5 to 410.38 | |
DAP dose area product, CAG coronary angiography, PCI percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention