Skip to main content
. 2015 May 16;28(6):654–663. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9803-7

Table 2.

ANOVA test results for the effect of median filtering on model dimensions

Dimension Unfiltered model (mm) Median filter 1 (mm) Median filter 2 (mm) Median filter 3 (mm)
UEW 48.2 ± 0.0 48.0 ± 0.30 47.9 ± 0.30 48.1 ± 0.20
UED 31.5 ± 0.18 31.8 ± 0.14 32.2 ± 0.17 32.2 ± 0.23
LEW 49.6 ± 0.15 49.2 ± 0.0 49.2 ± 0.0 49.4 ± 0.18
LED 31.7 ± 0.33 31.9 ± 0.02 31.8 ± 0.05 31.9 ± 0.21
VBHp Left 27.5 ± 0.37 27.3 ± 0.23 27.3 ± 0.25 27.2 ± 0.43
VBHp right 27.1 ± 0.22 26.9 ± 0.29 26.9 ± 0.28 26.9 ± 0.13
VBHa 27.3 ± 0.01 27.4 ± 0.10 27.4 ± 0.04 27.7 ± 0.13
SCW 23.9 ± 0.11 23.7 ± 0.17 24.0 ± 0.29 24.0 ± 0.25
SCD 20.5 ± 0.17 20.2 ± 0.18 20.9 ± 0.03 20.2 ± 0.17
PDW left 10.8 ± 0.01 10.7 ± 0.18 10.9 ± 0.09 10.9 ± 0.0
PDH left 16.9 ± 0.02 16.6 ± 0.04 16.9 ± 0.15 16.9 ± 0.20
PDW right 11.5 ± 0.3 11.5 ± 0.15 11.9 ± 0.05 12.0 ± 0.14
PDH right 17.0 ± 0.24 16.7 ± 0.04 16.8 ± 0.19 16.7 ± 0.03
TPW 78.0 ± 0.16 78.0 ± 0.35 77.9 ± 0.07 77.9 ± 0.06
VBa to SPp 85.4 ± 0.34 85.5 ± 0.04 85.5 ± 0.09 85.8 ± 0.03

Shaded cells indicate that ANOVA testing found a significant difference (P < 0.05) in that dimension compared to the unfiltered model