Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2015 Aug 10;129(5):576–588. doi: 10.1037/bne0000083

Table 2. Characterization of the Effect of Changing Reward Magnitude in the Temporal Bisection Task using Multilevel Logistic Regression.

Δγ-estimates, standard error (S.E.), z-values and p-values for fixed effects of reward magnitude and the interaction between genotype and reward magnitude. Low Reward → High Reward indicates the shift from phase 1 to phase 2, High Reward → Low Reward indicates the shift from phase 2 to phase 3. The genotype variable is centered at zero. Δγ-estimate indicates the unit change for either the constant coefficient (γ0) or the slope coefficient (γ1) in log-odds units. n.s. = not significant.

Coefficient Reward Change Δ γ-estimate S.E. Z-value p-value
Constant (γ0) (Timing Accuracy) Low Reward→ High Reward 0.06 0.04 1.64 n.s.
 Genotype × Low → High -0.26 0.08 -3.2 <0.01

High Reward→ Low Reward -0.26 0.04 -6.30 <0.001
 Genotype × High → Low -0.07 0.08 -0.89 n.s.

Slope (γ1) (Timing Precision) Low Reward→ High Reward 0.40 0.08 5.24 <0.001
 Genotype × Low → High 0.02 0.16 0.15 n.s.

High Reward→ Low Reward 0.02 0.08 0.21 n.s.
 Genotype × High → Low -0.31 0.16 -1.98 <0.05