Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;44(12):2257–2274. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0310-4

Table 2.

Multilevel models of individual status and clique hierarchization for physical and relational aggression

Boys’ cliques Girls’ cliques Mixed-gender cliquesa
Physical aggression Relational aggression Physical aggression Relational aggression Physical aggression Relational aggression
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE) b (SE)
Level 1
Individual status (IS) .12* (.05) .09 (.08) .09** (.04) .10 (.06) .09*** (.02) −.02 (.04) .10* (.04) .06 (.07) .19*** (.04) .24*** (.05) .19*** (.04) .20*** (.06)
Level 2
Clique status .26** (.08) .26** (.08) −.09 (.06) −.09 (.06) .14*** (.04) .14*** (.04) .06 (.07) .06 (.07) .17* (.09) .18* (.09) .33** (.11) .33** (.11)
Clique size −.00 (.01) −.00 (.01) −.01** (.00) −.01** (.00) .00 (.00) .00 (.00) .01** (.00) .01** (.00) .00 (.00) .00 (.00) −.01** (.00) −.01** (.00)
Clique hierarchization (CH) −.05 (.11) −.05 (.11) .41*** (.08) .41*** (.08) −.02 (.05) −.02 (.05) .07 (.09) .07 (.09) −.11 (.13) −.11 (.13) .26 (.17) .26 (.17)
Cross-level interaction
IS × CH .33 (.70) .02 (.53) .90** (.29) .36 (.50) −.65 (.44) .11 (.46)
df 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1
χ2 Deviance differenceb 21.54*** .22 86.51*** .01 40.71*** 9.58** 27.34*** .51 28.31*** 2.17 54.38*** .05

+ p < .1; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001

aFor mixed-gender cliques we also included gender as control variable (girl = 0/boy = 1). The effect of gender was .08*** (.01) for the models with physical aggression and −.08*** (.01) for the models with relational aggression

bThe decrease in χ2 deviance for models 1 of boys’ and girls’ cliques is compared with the deviance of the empty model, and of mixed-gender cliques compared with the deviance of the model including only gender. Model 2 is compared with model 1