Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2016 Jun;48(2):510–527. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0588-x

Table 3.

Comparison of geometric models (parameter-free physical measurements vs. optimized parameters) for near, medium, and far layouts. All values are distances in mm. Cx, Cy, Cz are the coordinates of the camera; Sx, Sy, Sz are the coordinates of the upper left-hand corner of the screen (cf. Fig. 3). An asterisk indicates the parameter was fixed to the physical layout measurement

Model Parameters Near Medium Far
Camera-to-pupil, Cx
  Physical 92 92 92
  Optimized 130 165 183
Camera-to-pupil, Cy
  Physical −310 −310 −310
  Optimized −215 −239 −230
Camera-to-pupil, Cz
  Physical 495 525 625
  Optimized 495* 525* 625*
Screen-NW-corner, Sx
  Physical −163 −163 −163
  Optimized −142 −87 −76
Screen-NW-corner, Sy
  Physical 58 58 58
  Optimized 206 140 156
Screen-NW-corner, Sz
  Physical 740 835 935
  Optimized 736 851 937