Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 9;5:16231. doi: 10.1038/srep16231

Figure 1. Selective state preparation procedure.

Figure 1

(a) A chain of Inline graphic closely spaced quantum emitters (separation Inline graphic with Inline graphic, Inline graphic being the laser wave number) are individually driven with a set of pumps Inline graphic. (b) The lasers are turned on for a time Inline graphic, optimized such that an effective Inline graphic-pulse into the desired subradiant target state is achieved. (c) Level structure for the Inline graphic systems where the Inline graphic-fold degeneracy of a given Inline graphic-excitation manifold is lifted by the dipole-dipole interactions. The target states are then reached by energy resolution (adjusting the laser frequency) and symmetry (choosing the proper Inline graphic). (d) Scaling of the decay rates of energetically ordered collective states starting from the ground state (state index Inline graphic) up to the single- and double-excitation manifolds for Inline graphic particles at a distance of a = 0.02λ0. The arrows identify the decay rates for the lowest energy states in the single (A) and double (B) excitation manifolds. (e) Numerical results of the time evolution of the target state population for N = 6 and a = 0.02 λ0 during and after the excitation pulse. Near unity population is achieved for both example states A (where we used η = 0.53 Γ) and B (for η = 2.44 Γ) followed by a subradiant evolution after the pulse time Inline graphic shown in contrast to the independent decay with a rate Inline graphic (dashed line).