Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;105(12):2578–2585. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302866

TABLE 2—

Characteristics of the Individual Study Sites as Reported by Trained Leaders (n = 85): The StrongWomen–Healthy Hearts Program, United States, 2010

Characteristic No. (%) or Mean ±SE Median (Range)
Competing priorities on leader’s timea
Present, and clearly noted 37 (61.7)
Present, but program is priority 14 (23.3)
None reported 5 (8.3)
Vague response 4 (6.7)
Continuous characteristics
Space availabilityb 3.8 ±0.05 4.0 (1.0)
Estimated cost,c US$ 263 ±42 20 (1070)
Likelihood to cover the costsd 3.2 ±0.1 3.3 (3.3)
Likelihood for costs to prevent the programe 1.0 ±0.1 1.0 (4.0)
Facility pleasantnessf 8.0 ±0.2 8.3 (8.0)
Accessibilityg 3.4 ±0.1 3.7 (2.5)
Equipment availabilityh 3.1 ±0.1 3.0 (2.0)
Time availabilityi 3.2 ±0.1 3.5 (3.0)

Note. The overall study spanned the years 2010 through 2014. The data in this table were collected just prior to the leader training in 2010.

a

Leaders were asked an open-ended question about competing priority areas of their work that would serve as a barrier to running the program. Responses were coded into these categories by the study team.

b

Sum of 4 binary indicators for sitting space, space for dancing, kitchen, and outside walking route.

c

Sum of estimated rent and cost of foods.

d

Average of three 5-level scales on abilities to cover rent, food costs, and printing; the range was 0 to 4, with 4 being highly likely.

e

Average of two 5-level scales on likelihood of rent and food cost being prohibitive; the range was 0 to 4, with 4 being highly likely.

f

Average of two 10-level scales on pleasantness of outside and inside of the facility; the range was 1 to 10, with 10 being most pleasant.

g

Average of three 5-level scales on categorized distance from downtown, and accessibilities by public transport and by car; the range was 0 to 4, with 4 being most accessible.

h

Sum of 4 binary indicators (availability of DVD, cooking equipment, pedometers, and storage place); the range was 0 to 4, with 4 being best equipped.

i

Average of two 5-level indicators on likelihood of being able to devote 5 hours per week to preparation and likelihood of this amount of time impeding ability to adopt the program (reversed coding); the range was 0 to 4, with 4 representing having adequate time for preparation.