TABLE 4—
Characteristic | No.a (%) | Mean (SE) | Median (Range) or 95% CI |
Reach | |||
Leader’s reach, % | 41 | 0.15 (0.03) | 0.06 (0.82) |
Leader’s representativeness score | 26 | 3.7 (0.2) | 4.0 (3.0) |
Effectivenessb,* | |||
Participants’ mean weight change, kg | 323 | −0.5 (0.1) | −0.7, −0.4 |
Participants’ mean fruit and vegetable consumption change, serving | 324 | 2.1 (0.3) | 1.5, 2.7 |
Participants’ mean physical activity change, MET-min/wk | 266 | 1238 (123) | 997, 1480 |
Adoption | |||
No. adopted/no. trained | 41/85 (48.2) | ||
Implementation | |||
Average fidelity score | |||
4th wk | 41 | 4.6 (0.1) | 4.8 (1.5) |
8th wk | 40 | 4.7 (0.1) | 4.8 (1.3) |
12th wk | 38 | 4.7 (0.1) | 4.9 (1.0) |
Maintenance | |||
No. maintained/no. adopted | 11/41 (26.8) |
Note. CI = confidence interval; MET = metabolic equivalent.
Number of leaders or participants.
Means, SEs, and 95% CIs are adjusted for clustering at the leader level.
*P < .05 for pre–post change in all outcome measures.