Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;105(12):2473–2481. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302878

TABLE 3—

Odds Ratios of Childhood Sexual Abuse, Intimate Partner Violence, and Depression and HIV Risk Factors, Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: HIV Prevention Trials Network 061, 6 US Cities, July 2009–December 2011

Having Any Insertive Condomless Anal Sex Past 6 Mo (n = 1273)a
Having Any Receptive Condomless Anal Sex Past 6 Mo (n = 877)b
Having > 3 Male Sexual Partners Past 6 Mo (n = 1518)
Variable Univariate OR (95% CI) Multivariable AOR (95% CI) Univariate OR (95% CI) Multivariable AOR (95% CI) Univariate OR (95% CI) Multivariable AOR (95% CI)
CSA
 Abuse when aged < 12 y vs no abuse 1.26 (0.81, 1.94) 1.38 (0.85, 2.22) 1.01 (0.60, 1.67) 0.85 (0.49, 1.47) 1.43 (1.11, 1.84) 1.32 (0.99, 1.74)
 Abuse when aged 12–16 y vs no abuse 0.92 (0.59, 1.42) 1.00 (0.63, 1.61) 0.54 (0.33, 0.89) 0.50 (0.29, 0.86) 1.09 (0.83, 1.43) 1.04 (0.77, 1.40)
Physical abuse, yes vs no 1.02 (0.69, 1.50) 1.17 (0.68, 2.01) 1.25 (0.82, 1.91) 1.02 (0.56, 1.86) 1.46 (1.16, 1.83) 1.23 (0.89, 1.71)
Emotional abuse, yes vs no 1.07 (0.75, 1.53) 1.18 (0.72, 1.95) 1.40 (0.95, 2.08) 1.35 (0.77, 2.37) 1.46 (1.19, 1.80) 1.14 (0.84, 1.54)
Stalked, yes vs no 1.04 (0.69, 1.55) 0.91 (0.56, 1.46) 1.67 (1.04, 2.68) 1.30 (0.73, 2.31) 1.34 (1.06, 1.69) 1.08 (0.81, 1.45)
Pressured or forced sexual abuse, yes vs no 0.86 (0.57, 1.30) 0.73 (0.44, 1.21) 1.68 (1.04, 2.69) 1.35 (0.76, 2.41) 1.34 (1.05, 1.70) 1.05 (0.77, 1.43)
CES-D score ≥ 16, yes vs no 0.79 (0.55, 1.12) 0.83 (0.56, 1.22) 0.86 (0.58, 1.28) 0.83 (0.53, 1.30) 1.07 (0.86, 1.32) 1.05 (0.82, 1.34)

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratios for age, sexual identity, education, type of last partner at sex (casual, exchange, or anonymous vs main or steady), enrollment HIV results, noninjection drug use, and site; CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; CI = confidence interval; CSA = childhood sexual abuse. The 6 US cities were Atlanta, GA; Boston, MA; Los Angeles, CA; New York City, NY; San Francisco, CA; and Washington, DC. The sample size was n = 1522.

a

Analysis included only men who have sex with men who reported having insertive anal sex at enrollment.

b

Analysis included only men who have sex with men who reported having receptive anal sex at enrollment.