Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;13(6):545–553. doi: 10.1370/afm.1838

Table 2.

Baseline Characteristics of Practices and Patients in Intervention and Control Groups

Characteristic Intervention Group Control Group
Practices n = 11 n = 10
GMS list size, No. (%)
 ≤500 1 (9.1) 2 (20.0)
 501–1,500 3 (27.3) 2 (20.0)
 ≥1,501 7 (63.6) 6 (60.0)
Have a manager, No. (%) 8 (72.8) 7 (70.0)
Location, No. (%)
 Urbana 8 (80.0) 8 (72.7)
 Mixed 3 (20.0) 2 (27.3)
GPs per practice, mean (SD) 4.1 (3.1) 4.1 (2.1)
Patients >70 years old per practice, mean (SD) 712.1 (525.3) 788.2 (987.2)
Deprivation score, median (IQR)b 0.5 (–0.3 to 1.6) 1.4 (0.3 to 2.4)
Patients n = 99 n = 97
Male, No. (%) 55 (55.6) 50 (51.5)
Marital status, No. (%)
 Married 56 (56.6) 51 (53.1)
 Widowed 26 (26.3) 32 (33.3)
 Single 14 (14.1) 10 (10.4)
GMS card holder, No. (%) 88 (88.9) 95 (97.9)
Age, mean (SD) 77.1 (4.9) 76.4 (4.8)
Repeat medications, mean (SD) 10.2 (4.5) 9.5 (4.1)
PIP drugsc
 Mean (SD) 1.31 (0.6) 1.39 (0.6)
 Median (IQR) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
Most prevalent PIP drug: proton pump inhibitors, No. (%) 53 (53.3) 65 (67.7)

GMS = general medical services; GP = general practitioner; IQR = interquartile range; PIP = potentially inappropriate prescribing.

Note: Figures are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise.

a

Urban area: relatively small center of population, with at least 5,000 residents.37

b

Population-weighted deprivation score for each practice; higher scores mean practices are situated in more socioeconomically deprived areas.

c

All patients had at least 1 potentially inappropriate prescription at baseline.