Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Oct 7;51(10):2528–2537. doi: 10.1021/ci200220v

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the success rates of AutoDock4 scoring functions and 16 scoring functions provided by Cheng et al.28 The cutoffs are rmsd < 1.0 Å (blue bars), < 2.0 Å (red bars), and < 3.0 Å (green bars), respectively. The native binding poses of ligands were included in the decoy sets. Scoring functions are sorted by the number of cases under 2Å.