Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Oct 7;51(10):2528–2537. doi: 10.1021/ci200220v

Table 7.

RMS prediction errors of AutoDock4 scoring functions for neutral ligands in the testing set

scoring function 569 cases 43 casesa
AutoDock4RGG 3.004 3.022
AutoDock4RAP 3.087 2.755
AutoDock4RRP 3.088 2.702
original AutoDock4GG 3.253 2.938
a

These 43 cases are large dipole moment ligands. (Debye > 12.5)

All values of RMS prediction errors are in kcal/mol.