Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;5:16342. doi: 10.1038/srep16342

Table 3. BPI Scores, Functional Impairment, and Quality of Life at Pre-Session 1 (Baseline) Compared to those at Follow-Up in the NT, PT-TENS and Cross-over-to-NT (XO) Groups.

A. Study Onea,b
Measurement Mean Score Pre-Session1 (SD) Mean Score at Follow-Up (SD) Mean of Score Difference (95% CI) One-Sample t test p-value Wilcoxon Signed-rank testp-value
BPI “at-its-worst”
 NT (n = 22) 7.7 (0.9) 0.8 (1.5) −6.9 (−7.7–−6.1) <0.0001 <0.0001
 PT-TENS (n = 8) 8.1 (1.1) 8.2 (1.5) 0.1 (−1.2–1.5) 0.84 1
 XO (n = 7) 8.1 (1.6) 1.3 (1.1) −6.9 (−8.5–−5.2) 0.00059 0.022
BPI “average”
 NT (n = 22) 5.2 (1.5) 0.5 (1.2) −4.6 (−5.4–−3.9) <0.0001 <0.0001
 PT-TENS (n = 8) 5.9 (1.5) 6.6 (1.7) 0.7 (−0.4–1.8) 0.19 0.20
 XO (n = 7) 6.4 (1.7) 0.6 (0.7) −5.8 (−7.2–−4.3) 0.00069 0.022
BPI “right-now”
 NT (n = 22) 5.2 (2.3) 0.6 (1.3) −4.7 (−5.8–−3.5) <0.0001 <0.0001
 PT-TENS (n = 8) 5.6 (2.2) 6.8 (2) 1.2 (0.1–2.3) 0.037 0.58
 XO (n = 7) 6.6 (2.1) 0.6 (0.5) −6 (−7.7–−4.3) 0.00013 0.022
Functional Impairment
 NT (n = 22) 10.2 (6.9) 2.3 (3.3) −7.9 (−10.8–−5) <0.0001 <0.0001
 PT-TENS (n = 8) 5.8 (8) 7 (4.9) 1.2 (−3.5–6) 0.55 0.59
 XO (n = 7) 6.7 (5.2) 1.9 (2.9) −4.9 (−7.5–−2.2) 0.0045 0.022
Quality of Life- Accumulative BPI “interference with functions”
 NT (n = 22) 26.4 (16.6) 3.4 (8) −23 (−30.6–−15.4) <0.0001 <0.0001
 PT-TENS (n = 8) 27.5 (13.3) 27.9 (10.9) 0.4 (−3.4–4.3) 0.80 0.83
 XO (n = 7) 29.1 (11.3) 3.7 (5.6) −25.4 (−36–−14.7) 0.0011 0.015
B. Study Two
Measurement Mean Score Pre-Session1 (SD) Mean Score at Follow-1 (SD) Mean of Score Difference (95% CI) One-Sample t Test p-value Wilcoxon Signed-rank testp-value
(a) Baseline vs. Follow-up 1
 BPI “at-its-worst”
  NT(n = 20) 6.5 (1.3) 2.1 (2.0) −4.5 (−5.6–−3.3) <0.0001 0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 6.4 (1.5) 4.1 (1.8) −1.8 (−3.0–−0.6) 0.0058 0.0039
 BPI “average”
  NT (n = 20) 5.0 (1.4) 1.3 (1.4) −3.6 (−4.5–−2.8) <0.0001 0.00013
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 4.3 (1.4) 3.4 (1.5) −0.9 (−1.8–−0.1) 0.064 0.05
 BPI “right-now”
  NT (n = 20) 4.3 (1.6) 1.4 (1.5) −3.0 (−4.0–−2.0) <0.0001 0.00022
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 3.3 (2.2) 2.8 (1.5) −0.4 (−1.5–0.6) 0.37 0.28
 Functional Impairment
  NT 14.1 (9.1) (n = 20) 7.6 (8.4) (n = 16) −8.1 (−11.5–−4.6) 0.00018 0.001
  PT-TENS 14.8 (6.6) (n = 18) 11.6 (6.1) (n = 17) −3.6 (−6.5–0.6) 0.02 0.027
 Quality of Life- Accumulative BPI “interference with functions”
  NT (n = 20) 36.3 (12.0) 8.6 (10.9) −27.8 (−34.3–−21.2) <0.0001 0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 33.4 (12.9) 22.4 (10.9) −11 (−18.4–−3.6) 0.0058 0.01
(b) Baseline vs. Follow-up 2
 BPI “at-its-worst”
  NT(n = 20) 6.5 (1.3) 2.3 (1.8) −4.45 (−5.6–−3.3) <0.0001 <0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 6.4 (1.5) 4.4 (2.2) −2.3 (−3.7–−0.9) 0.0040 0.0054
 BPI “average”
  NT (n = 20) 5.0 (1.4) 1.5 (1.5) −3.5 (−4.4–−2.6) <0.0001 <0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 4.3 (1.4) 3.3 (1.9) −0.9 (−2.0–−0.1) 0.007 0.08
 BPI “right-now”
  NT (n = 20) 4.3 (1.6) 1.4 (1.4) −3.0 (−3.9–−2.1) <0.0001 <0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 3.3 (2.2) 3.2 (1.8) −0.06 (−1.0–0.9) 0.9 0.9
 Functional Impairment
  NT 14.1 (9.1) (n = 20) 8.9 (8.2) (n = 15) −6.9 (−10.3–−3.5) 0.0007 0.0005
  PT-TENS 14.8 (6.6) (n = 18) 11.6 (5.8) (n = 16) −3.6 (−6.9–−0.4) 0.03 0.02
 Quality of Life- Accumulative BPI “interference with functions”
  NT (n = 20) 36.3 (12.0) 8.7 (9.0) −27.7 (−33.9–−21.4) <0.0001 <0.0001
  PT-TENS (n = 18) 33.4 (12.9) 22.1 (13.5) −11.3 (−18.4–−4.1) 0.004 0.006

aAll results for the NT (test arm), PT-TENS (control arm) and XO (Crossover-to-NT) groups followed LOCF imputation. All patients except those undergoing no post-baseline observations were included.

bSD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.