Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 2;112(40):672–679. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0672

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Means for individual items of the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) Scale

1: The clinician draws attention to an identified problem as one that requires a decision making process.

2: The clinician states that there is more than one way to deal with the identified problem (’equipoise’).

3: The clinician assesses patient’s preferred approach to receiving information to assist decision making (e.g. discussion in consultations, read printed material, assess graphical data, use videotapes or other media.

4: The clinician lists ’options’, which can include the choice of ’no action’.

5: The clinician explains the pros and cons of options to the patient (taking ’no action’ is an option).

6: The clinician explores the patient’s expectations (or ideas) about how the problem(s) are to be managed.

7: The clinician explores the patient’s concerns (fears) about how problem(s) are to be managed.

8: The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information.

9: The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during decision making process.

10: The clinical elicits the patient’s preferred level of involvement in decision making.

11: The clinician indicates the need for a decision making (or deferring) stage.

12: The clinician indicates the need to review the decision (or deferment)