Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;6:8729. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9729

Table 2. Relative number of slow waves.

  Cue Cue from ‘cued+feedback' t P-Value Feedback from ‘cued+feedback' t P-Value
Sleep group I+II
Gains 45.16±3.02 33.06±2.18 3.41 0.003** 39.84±2.16 2.41 0.049*
Losses 32.85±3.21 24.53±2.19 2.39 0.027* 27.84±81 1.39 0.183
  Cue from ‘cued+late feedback' Cue from ‘cued+tone' t P-Value Feedback from ‘cued+late feedback' t P-Value
Control group
Gains 49.80±4.78 32.82±5.07 3.97 0.003** 39.44±3.92 2.25 0.048*
Losses 34.85±3.95 28.24±3.58 1.89 0.087 29.74±3.61 1.58 0.144

Data are means±s.e.m.; relative numbers of slow waves following word onset of cues (the percentage of word presentations, which were followed by slow waves) and separately for the cues and the feedback of the ‘cue+feedback' category. For sleep groups I+II (that is, false- and correct-feedback groups), first columns including t-and P-values correspond to differences in the appearance of slow waves between ‘cue' versus cue from ‘cued+feedback'. t- and P-values on the right side depict differences between ‘cue' and feedback from ‘cued and feedback'. For the control group, first columns including t-and P-values correspond to differences in the appearance of slow waves between cue from ‘cued+late feedback' versus cue from ‘cued+tone'. t- and P-values on the right side depict differences between cue ‘cued+late feedback' and Feedback from ‘cued and late feedback'. *P<0.05; **P<0.01.