Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;2:150061. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.61

Table 4. Fields, data types, discrepancy rates and interpretational issues in quality check tests of Australian Bird Data Version 1 (Data Citation 1).

Field category Fields [description] Nature of data Level of interpretation Test taxa n fields checked n species checked * n cells checked % error in database % interpretational discrepancies Source of interpretational discrepancies
Taxonomy & nomenclature Species, Subspecies, Ultrataxon binary None all 3 100 296 0 0
Australian population status Population description 16 categories Moderate species 1 100 100 0 0
Australian population status Core, Non-breeding population, Extinct, Introduced, Vagrant, Supplementary binary Slight species 6 95 570 0 0
Conservation status Global IUCN status 2014 9 categories None species 1 99 99 0 0
Distribution [Occurrence on] Continental islands and Offshore islands only binary/tertiary Slight all 3 95 285 0 0
Habitat [breeding habitats] binary Great species 17 87 1479 1.1 2.1 misalignment of habitat categories between database and sources, and failure of source to discriminate between breeding and other habitat
Breeding Nest aggregation: Solitary, Colonial, Parasitic binary Moderate species 3 78 234 0.6 1.9 borderline cases between solitary and dispersed (loose) colonies

*this was often less than the 100 taxa randomly selected because the test extractor proved unable to identify suitable data from the key source.