Table 4. Fields, data types, discrepancy rates and interpretational issues in quality check tests of Australian Bird Data Version 1 (Data Citation 1).
Field category | Fields [description] | Nature of data | Level of interpretation | Test taxa | n fields checked | n species checked * | n cells checked | % error in database | % interpretational discrepancies | Source of interpretational discrepancies |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taxonomy & nomenclature | Species, Subspecies, Ultrataxon | binary | None | all | 3 | 100 | 296 | 0 | 0 | |
Australian population status | Population description | 16 categories | Moderate | species | 1 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Australian population status | Core, Non-breeding population, Extinct, Introduced, Vagrant, Supplementary | binary | Slight | species | 6 | 95 | 570 | 0 | 0 | |
Conservation status | Global IUCN status 2014 | 9 categories | None | species | 1 | 99 | 99 | 0 | 0 | |
Distribution | [Occurrence on] Continental islands and Offshore islands only | binary/tertiary | Slight | all | 3 | 95 | 285 | 0 | 0 | |
Habitat | [breeding habitats] | binary | Great | species | 17 | 87 | 1479 | 1.1 | 2.1 | misalignment of habitat categories between database and sources, and failure of source to discriminate between breeding and other habitat |
Breeding | Nest aggregation: Solitary, Colonial, Parasitic | binary | Moderate | species | 3 | 78 | 234 | 0.6 | 1.9 | borderline cases between solitary and dispersed (loose) colonies |
*this was often less than the 100 taxa randomly selected because the test extractor proved unable to identify suitable data from the key source.