Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Mar 7;60(5):2075–2090. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/5/2075

Table 1.

Summary of experimental and algorithmic parameters.

Simulation study
CT Dimension 512 × 512 × 894 voxels
Voxel size 0.73 × 0.73 × 0.50 mm3
Perturbation range (3σ) (x, y, z)s (±100, ±100, ±200 mm)
(x, y, z)obj (±100, ±100, ±200 mm)
(η, θ, ϕ)obj (±10°, ±10°, ±10°)
Simulated radiograph Dimension 2560 × 3072 pixels
Pixel size 0.139 × 0.139 mm2

Cadaver study

CT Dimension 512 × 512 × 1427 voxels
Voxel size 0.67 × 0.67 × 0.60 mm3
Mobile radiograph Dimension 2560 × 3072 pixels
Pixel size 0.139 × 0.139 mm2
Regions thoracic, abdominal, pelvic
SDD ~800, ~1000, ~1200 mm

Optimization parameters

Population size λ = 50
Number of multi-starts N = 100
Image dimensions in Level1 1252 pixels
multi-resolution pyramid Level2 5002 pixels
Upper/lower bound of the (x,y,z)s (±100, ±100, ±200 mm)
search space (x,y,z)obj (±100, ±100, ±200 mm)
(η, θ, ϕ)obj (±10°, ±10°, ±10°)