Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2014 Jun 12;35(22):1621–1629. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23655

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Energy contributions to the binding energy of the MUP-I protein to a series of aliphatic alcohols as a function of the chain length, calculated with the implicit solvent model (Eelec given by eq 10; Evdw by eq 4, and Ehydr is the cavity-formation energy). (A) Uncorrected dispersion energy ( Evdw=Evdw0 in eq 4); and (B) solvent-dispersion corrected energy ( Evdw=Evdw0+Vdisp). The structures of the complexes are taken from the PDB; accession codes 1znd, 1zne, 1zng, 1znh, 1znk, 1znl, for pentan-, hexan-, heptan-, octan-, nonan-, and decan-1-ol, respectively. The experimental binding enthalpy26Hexp) is also shown (ITC data for decan-1-ol not available). Binding is dominated by dispersive forces, as determined by the extent of sub-optimal hydration of the binding pocket.