Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 9;15:163. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0155-3

Table 3.

Pooled ORs and 95 % CIs of the association between the VEGF rs2146323 polymorphism and DR in six models

Model Contrasts Number of study Pooled method OR (95 % CI) Z Pz Heterogeneity
I2 P
Dominant CA + AA vs. CC Chinese 1 Fixed-effect 1.40 (0.97–2.00) 1.81 0.070
Caucasian 3 1.37 (1.03–1.81) 2.16 0.031 0.0 % 0.538
Overall 4 1.38 (1.10–1.72) 2.82 0.005 0.0 % 0.741
Allele A vs. C Chinese 1 Random-effect 1.52 (1.14–2.03) 2.88 0.004
Caucasian 3 1.03 (0.75–1.43) 0.19 0.847 52.1 % 0.124
Overall 4 1.16 (0.88–1.53) 1.02 0.306 59.9 % 0.058
Recessive AA vs. CA + CC Chinese 1 Random-effect 2.65 (1.40–5.00) 3.01 0.003
Caucasian 3 0.73 (0.29–1.85) 0.67 0.504 63.9 % 0.063
Overall 4 1.04 (0.43–2.53) 0.09 0.928 77.5 % 0.004
Co-dominant CA vs. CC Chinese 1 Fixed-effect 1.15 (0.78–1.71) 0.72 0.470
Caucasian 3 1.52 (1.13–2.04) 2.75 0.006 0.0 % 0.601
Overall 4 1.37 (1.08–1.74) 2.63 0.008 0.0 % 0.529
Co-dominant AA vs. CC Chinese 1 Random-effect 2.80 (1.46–5.37) 3.09 0.002
Caucasian 3 0.89 (0.35–2.24) 0.25 0.801 59.0 % 0.087
Overall 4 1.26 (0.56–2.84) 0.55 0.585 70.8 % 0.016
Over-dominant CA vs. CC + AA Chinese 1 Random-effect 1.00 (0.68–1.46) 0.01 0.991
Caucasian 3 1.55 (1.09–2.21) 2.41 0.016 29.1 % 0.244
Overall 4 1.36 (0.96–1.91) 1.74 0.081 51.2 % 0.105
Additive CC vs. AA Chinese 1 Random-effect 0.36 (0.19–0.69) 3.09 0.002
Caucasian 3 1.10 (0.46–2.66) 0.22 0.828 55.2 % 0.107
Overall 4 0.79 (0.36–1.76) 0.57 0.567 69.8 % 0.019