Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0141460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141460

Table 1. Percentage of reptiles acquired over five years preceding the study which were reported by respondents (N = 265) to be captive bred, wild, captive farmed or of unknown origin.

Also includes the number of respondents and the total number of individual animals used in the analysis.

Taxa % captive bred % wild % captive farmed % unknown n (respondents) n (animals) a
All snakes 97.1 1.2 0.8 0.4 203 4954
Boas & pythons 96.2 0.8 1.1 0.1 165 3517
King & rat snakes 97.4 0.8 0.0 1.6 134 1038
Other snakes 92.3 2.6 0.0 0.5 55 417
All chelonians 69.2 9.1 5.1 12.3 62 276
Tortoises & box turtles 70.9 9.1 9.1 10.9 49 165
Turtles & terrapins 48.4 9.9 0.0 25.3 18 91
All lizards 86.8 6.3 2.1 2.3 185 1459
Chameleons 88.8 3.1 1.0 5.1 39 98
Geckoes 93.2 2.8 0.0 2.9 120 782
Skinks 83.3 11.1 0.0 2.8 17 36
Iguanas 76.1 15.2 2.2 6.5 22 46
Tegus & monitors 68.3 9.9 12.9 2.0 43 101
Agamids 84.1 7.8 0.0 2.6 84 271
Other lizards 58.6 20.0 0.0 0.0 20 70

a Some respondents’ were unable to provide data for the more detailed categories e.g. ‘boas and pythons’, therefore their sum is not always equal to the total for that group e.g. ‘all snakes’. The total number of reptiles used in the study is calculated from the sum of the ‘all snakes’, ‘all chelonians’ and ‘all lizards’ categories.