Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Gerontol. 2013 Apr 15;34(2):158–180. doi: 10.1177/0733464813483210

Table 2.

Logistic Regression of Age-Friendly Factors on Expectation to Age in Place (N=1,376 Community-Dwelling Older Adults Age 60 and Older Living in Detroit in 2001).

ß SE ß OR
Age-friendly community factors
 Access to business and leisure −0.04 0.07 0.97
 Access to health care −0.03 0.09 0.96
 Neighborhood problems −0.61*** 0.08 0.54
 Social interaction 0.02 0.08 1.01
 Social support 0.11 0.08 1.12
 Community engagement 0.02 0.09 1.03
Demographic characteristics
 Female 0.10 0.14 1.10
 Age 0.03*** 0.01 1.03
 Race (White ref)
  Black/African American 0.18 0.19 1.20
  Other 0.07 0.31 1.07
 Education (no HS ref)
  High school graduate −0.04 −0.16 0.96
  Some college or higher −0.29 −0.15 0.75
 Low income (below 125% poverty line) −0.40* 0.21 1.49
 Lives alone −0.12 0.14 0.88
 Owns home 0.64*** 0.17 1.90
 Drives −0.24 0.15 0.79
 Years at current address 0.004 0.005 1.00
Health characteristics
 Self-rated health −0.04 0.07 0.97
 Number of chronic conditions −0.003 0.08 1.00
 Health limits activities −0.12 0.10 0.89
 Health limits stairs 0.02 0.10 1.02
Interaction terms
 Low income × access to business and leisure 0.05 0.11 1.05
 Low income × access to health care 0.02 0.13 1.02
 Low income × neighborhood problems −0.15 0.22 0.86
 Low income × social interaction 0.11 0.20 1.11
 Low income × social support −0.15 0.20 0.86
 Low income × community engagement −0.01 0.24 0.99

Note:

*

p ≤.05.

**

p ≤.01.

***

p ≤.001.