Fig. S10.

Among recording sites that lie in both object size maps and visual field maps, object size preferences and pRF properties of recording sites are not consistently correlated. (A) Preferred object size is not significantly correlated with pRF eccentricity. (B) Preferred object size is not significantly correlated with pRF size. (C) Preferred numerosity is not significantly correlated with pRF eccentricity. (D) Preferred numerosity is not significantly correlated with pRF size. r values are Pearson’s correlation coefficients, although Spearman’s rank correlation gives similar results. When calculating corresponding P values, the number of recording sites is adjusted to compensate for upsampling of data during transformation to cortical surface models. Lines represent the best-fitting linear relationship between object size preferences and pRF properties. Although some P values do reach significance at P < 0.05 in individual hemispheres, the directions of these correlations are not consistent between hemispheres, and only 1 of 40 remains significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.